Landlord's notice to quit ruled invalid over identity issue

A landlord’s notice to quit has been ruled invalid because, although it was delivered to the correct address, it incorrectly identified an individual as the tenant instead of his company.

The case involved Thomas and Turner. Mr Thomas had been granted a tenancy of an agricultural holding. He then assigned it to his company, OG Thomas Amaethyddiaeth CYF, without informing the landlord. The landlord served a notice to quit by recorded delivery post to Thomas at his home address, which was also the company's registered office. Neither Thomas nor the company served a counter-notice. The landlord brought a claim seeking validation of the notice. 

The High Court held that the notice to quit was valid despite having been addressed to Thomas, as a reasonable recipient of the notice would have appreciated that a mistake had been made in naming the tenant and would have read it as having been addressed to the company. 

The Court of Appeal overturned that decision. It held that although a notice could be considered valid where the name of a correctly identified recipient was wrongly spelled, it could not be rescued where the recipient was wrongly identified. A notice addressed to A and received by A could not be regarded as being a notice given to B, even if A knew that B would have been the correct recipient. 

Please contact us if you have a question about the issues raised in this article or any aspect of commercial property law on 020 8290 0333 or email info@judge-priestley.co.uk.

For information on our Commercial Property Law services please click here.